Last Updated On -19 Apr 2025
The idea of utility in economics aids in our comprehension of consumer behavior, or how people make decisions and find enjoyment in products and services. However, there is disagreement among economists about the best technique to quantify utility.
Two main strategies have resulted from looking for a technique to quantify utility:
Every one of these ideas offers a unique perspective on how to evaluate human pleasure and clarifies the reasoning behind price, demand, and customer preferences.
Let's quickly review the definition of utility before delving into the two strategies. The satisfaction or advantage a customer receives from using a good or service is known as utility. You're earning utility each time you sip your preferred coffee or watch your favorite Netflix program. Let's now examine the two primary interpretations of this satisfaction offered by economists.
Read more about the Consumer Equilibrium Marginal Utility.
The idea of "cardinal utility" makes the assumption that utility can be quantified. This implies that the degree of satisfaction a person receives from a good can be given a defined value.
For example, according to the consumer, "I get 20 utils from tea and 10 from coffee" suggests that tea provides twice as much enjoyment, or if you consume two chocolates, the first one will provide you with fifty utils. You get 30 utils from the second.
To claim that you are completely satisfied, you can add the utilities.This method enables accurate mathematical computations and aids in the development of early hypotheses by economists, such as consumer equilibrium and the law of diminishing marginal utility.
Ordinal Utility, on the other hand, makes the assumption that utility can only be ranked according to preference and cannot be quantified. Customers are unable to quantify contentment precisely. Instead, they can rate their preferences. "I prefer tea over coffee," a customer may say, but not "Tea gives me twice the satisfaction." This serves as the basis for contemporary demand theory and indifference curve analysis.
For example, Pizza, burgers, and fries are your three snack options.You assign them a ranking:
Pizza is the most popular. Burger is normal. The least favorite food is fries. Ordinal utility is at work there. You have expressed your preference without providing a numerical value.
Ordinal utility is thought to be more realistic and useful in contemporary economics. Although early theories were based on cardinal usefulness, the notion of quantifying satisfaction is mainly out of date. Ordinal preferences and instruments like revealed preference theory and indifference curves are increasingly used by economists today.
The key differences between Cardinal Utility vs Ordinal Utility is tabulated below:
Cardinal utility |
Ordinal utility |
It is measurable in numbers, utils |
It is ranked in the order of preferences |
The approach is quantitative |
The approach is qualitative |
“Tea gives 50 utils, coffee gives 20” |
“I prefer coffee over tea” |
The law of diminishing marginal utility, and consumer equilibrium is based on this |
The indifference curve theory and the budget line is based on this |
This is less realistic |
This is more realistic |
Early utility theories are based on it |
The modern consumer analysis is based on this |
Read the Commerce Topics and level up your knowledge today!
The ordinal utility is the most common and widely used utility theory, as it has a realistic approach to the consumer behaviour.
Yes, but not simultaneously. The economists use them separately which depends on the model or situation.
The “utils” are hypothetical and it cannot be measured or compared across the individuals, which makes the cardinal approach unrealistic.